Logo Wilderness Trailcraft
email: 
password: 
remember me
<< Too many mountain pictures - try macro shotsMainA moose can swim underwater >>
 
Backpacking with tripods should be simple 
Published on
 

There are photographers and there are those that take pictures.  Unfortunately, I’m in the latter category.  I just can’t quite categorize myself as a full-fledged photographer because I’m missing the artistic eye.  It’s not from lack of trying.  I have read dozens of books, I’ve attended classes and I’ve bought thousands of dollars in equipment but I still can’t “see” the picture before I take it.  However, lack of talent doesn’t keep me from taking photographic gear with me on every backpacking trip.

 

I sometimes take as much as 10 or 12 pounds of gear but usually I try to take the minimum.  One item I consistently struggle with is the tripod.  My best photos have always been taken when the light is low enough that a tripod is necessary for a high-quality picture.  But the weight of a tripod is a real problem.

 

Here’s the dilemma. Tripods are designed to hold a camera still.  Heavy tripods hold cameras still better than light tripods.  Therefore, most tripods are heavy and it is hard as heck to find a quality tripod that is light.  If you go to a website like B&H Photo (my personal favorite) you’ll find lots of tripods that are carbon fiber and even call themselves mountaineering tripods but you’ll be stunned to see how much they weigh.  For example, The Gitzo G1158 Carbon Fiber Mountaineer Sport (sounds light, doesn’t it?) weighs in at a porky 3.6 lbs.  I’m sure that’s light for a professional tripod but that’s heavier than my tent, my backpack or my sleeping bag.

 

So what is a backpacker to do?  I’ve found two reasonable (but not great) solutions.  The first is my minimalist approach.  I got a mini tripod from REI.

 

Mini REI tripod (4 oz)

 

This tripod works as well as any mini-tripod can.  Plus it has a Velcro strap that attaches the tripod to other stable fixtures.  I usually use the Velcro strap to attach the tripod to one of my trekking poles.  Then, I have a nice monopod.  If I want completely hands free operation then I either stick my trekking pole into the ground or prop it up with something.  That works in non-windy situations.  It doesn't work in the wind.

 

The second reasonable approach is a regular tripod that is acceptably light.  I haven’t found a more flexible and light tripod on the market as the Slik Sprint Pro.

 

Slik Sprint Pro (32.7 oz)

 

The Slik weighs about 2 pounds and extends to a height of 64”.  The vertical post also comes apart so you can attach the camera underneath the tripod.  This is handy for macro shots.  You can also adjust the legs to be completely horizontal so you can keep the camera upright and get down very close to the ground.  The tripod is designed to have a head attached but I attach the camera directly to the tripod.

 

The Slik is a good option but it sure seems like someone could make an even lighter option with the same capabilities.  The slik is not carbon fibor; I think it’s made of aluminum.

 
Bookmark with:  add to digg.com   add to del.icio.us   add to Furl   add to spurl
Published by rwhitney in photography
 
 
Comments

Thanks for the tripod post. It is possible that you have visited my blogs (dan's outside - http://outside.danmitchell.org and G Dan Mitchell Photography - http://www.gdanmitchell.com/) since I post a lot of my photography at both of them, including a lot of work done while backpacking. Eventually I need to write my tripod summary, but here's a short version of the story. Like many photographers on the trail I initially resisted using a tripod given the extra weight and bother of carrying and using one. Back in the days when I carried a "point and shoot" camera on the trail I also carried one of those little REI units, but mainly so that I could occasionally include myself in the photos - but, frankly, more often I just found a nice rock to support the camera. A few years ago I again became serioius about my backpacking (and other) photography and I begen to consider the tripod question again. At first I resisted the price, size, and weight of good tripods and I ended up with a little SLIK mini tripod that can't weigh more than a pound, if that. Since I used it with a fairly light camera (Canon Pro 1) it worked OK during my 2004 backpacking season. However, as I became more critical of my work I realized that it was too flimsy - especially if there was any wind - and not tall enough. I began looking for a better tripod. Still not quite accepting the knowledge among photographers that a good tripod is priceliss, I looked for a deal. I ended up with a Carmagne tripod, a fairly light carbon fibre model that collapses to a reasonable size. Although it is not quite up to the standard of the Giotto, Manfrotto, Gitzo models, it is good enough for now. I did replace the head with a very nice Acratech ballhead. There is no escapihng the issues that come with carrying a real tripod. It is going to be heavy - four pounds with head is probably about as light as you can go, and heavier is possible. The tripod is also difficult to pack. My approach is to stash it on the back (or occasionally side) of my backpack, which means that I must remove the pack in oder to use it. Frankly, the size, weight, and packing issues affect your backpacking/hiking less than the fact that you end up being on the prowl for images. This slows me down quite a bit, both so that I can see more and more clearly, and because "stopping to take a picture" becomes a minimum five minute job if I'm serious about the image, and because sometimes the stop ends up lasting 30, 60, or 90 minutes! :-) On the bright side... hunting for images heightens the experience for me. I see much more when I'm carrying a camera and I'm far more aware of what I'm seeing and its many levels of beauty. Besides, slowing down can be a Good Thing. :-) Dan

Submitted on by Dan Mitchell

Dan, I love your blog and I love checking out your photos. I also have a Canon Powershot Pro 1 as well as several other cameras but the Pro 1 is usually my camera of choice for backpacking. It seems to be a good compromise for quality of photos and weight. I've taken my DSLR (Canon 5D) a few times but I have more trouble narrowing my pack list down to one lens with the SLR. I'll check out the Carmagne tripod you recommend.

Submitted on by rwhitney | website
 
 
Submit a comment
 
Name (required):
 
Email Address (required, not shown):
 
Website (optional):
 
Enter Code (required):
 
Comment (limited html tags are OK):
 
About
Author Photo
All about backpacking & hiking gear, ideas and techniques.
 
Blog Roll
 
Hiking
 besthike.com - the blog
 Hiking Ideas Update
 Modern Hiker
 Treknologies
 Two-Heel Drive
 Ultra-Lite Skunk Works
 
Misc
 Dark Roasted Blend
 
Outdoors
 The Adventure Blog
 Wicked Outdoorsy
 
Photography
 Dan's Outside
 Stephen J Rauch
 
Tags
 
 beverages (6)
 books (1)
 cooking (8)
 dogs (3)
 fishing (6)
 fitness (6)
 gear (3)
 hints (4)
 humor (4)
 lightweight (13)
 navigation (1)
 park (2)
 photography (10)
 tents (1)
 trip (9)
 wildlife (2)
 
Recent EntriesRSS feed of recent blog entries
 
 Nice approach to fire starting
 Water Pumps and Cold Weather
 A good cold breakfast
 Extreme Dog Jumping
 TracMe Personal Locator Beacon
 Better than a personal locater beacon (PLB)
 Maybe ATVs are not that bad
 Those beautiful Sawtooth Mountains
 Pack a daypack
 Hubba Galore
 
Archive
 
2007
 November
 September
 June
 May
 April
 March
 February
 January
2006
 December
 November
 
Winter
 
rss feed
Add to My AOL
Add to My Yahoo
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to My MSN
Subscribe in Bloglines
Add to Google
 
© 2005-8